New York (State). Supreme Court.
Other books by this author
A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme court of judicature
New York (State). Supreme Court.
A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme court of judicature
Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants
Charles Dibbs, appellant vs. the Dry Doc, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, respondent
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Charles Dibbs, appellant vs. the Dry Doc, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, respondent
Charles S. Fairchild, John E. Parsons and John A. Bartow, as executors of the last will and testament of Mary A. Edson, deceased, plaintiffs, against Marmont B. Edson et al., defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Charles S. Fairchild, John E. Parsons and John A. Bartow, as executors of the last will and testament of Mary A. Edson, deceased, plaintiffs, against Marmont B. Edson et al., defendants
David Lyman, appellant, against Joseph H. Parsons, Catharine M. Parsons, William Stanley & Elizabeth A. Stanley, his wife, and Caroline J. Parsons and Elizabeth Parsons, respondents
New York (State). Supreme Court.
David Lyman, appellant, against Joseph H. Parsons, Catharine M. Parsons, William Stanley & Elizabeth A. Stanley, his wife, and Caroline J. Parsons and Elizabeth Parsons, respondents
David Stewart, respondent vs. Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others
New York (State). Supreme Court.
David Stewart, respondent vs. Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others
David Stewart, respondent, against Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others
New York (State). Supreme Court.
David Stewart, respondent, against Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others
Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors of the will of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors of the will of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant
Emily O. Butler, Fanny S. Whitehouse, Caroline O. Jones, Frances O. Jones and Louis B. McCagg, plaintiffs, against Andrew H. Green and others, executors and trustees of and under the last will and testament of William B. Ogden, deceased, and others, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Emily O. Butler, Fanny S. Whitehouse, Caroline O. Jones, Frances O. Jones and Louis B. McCagg, plaintiffs, against Andrew H. Green and others, executors and trustees of and under the last will and testament of William B. Ogden, deceased, and others, defendants
Francis Vose, respondent, vs. David L. Yulee, appellant
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Francis Vose, respondent, vs. David L. Yulee, appellant
Harriet Haddock, plaintiff, against John W. Haddock, defendant, before John H. Rogan, Esq., referee
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Harriet Haddock, plaintiff, against John W. Haddock, defendant, before John H. Rogan, Esq., referee
In the matter of opening the Spuyten Duyvil Parkway
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of opening the Spuyten Duyvil Parkway
In the matter of the application of the East River bridge company for the appointment of three commissioners
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the application of the East River bridge company for the appointment of three commissioners
In the matter of the application of the New York District Railway Company for the appointment of three commissioners to determine whether its railroad ought to be allowed to be built, &c
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the application of the New York District Railway Company for the appointment of three commissioners to determine whether its railroad ought to be allowed to be built, &c
In the matter of the application of the New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company to acquire title to certain real estate of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, and others
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the application of the New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company to acquire title to certain real estate of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, and others
In the matter of the petition of the Metropolitan Transit Company of the city of New York, to determine the amount of compensation to be paid the mayor, alderman and commonalty of the city of New York
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the petition of the Metropolitan Transit Company of the city of New York, to determine the amount of compensation to be paid the mayor, alderman and commonalty of the city of New York
In the matter of the State Reservation at Niagara
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the State Reservation at Niagara
In the matter of the visitation and inspection of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children by the Supreme Court pursuant to section 16 of the membership corporations law
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of the visitation and inspection of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children by the Supreme Court pursuant to section 16 of the membership corporations law
In the matter of William Winter, a person of unsound mind
New York (State). Supreme Court.
In the matter of William Winter, a person of unsound mind
Isidor Wormser, Jr., plaintiff, against Metropolitan Street Railway Company and Interurban Street Railway Company, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Isidor Wormser, Jr., plaintiff, against Metropolitan Street Railway Company and Interurban Street Railway Company, defendants
James Fisk, Jr., against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Credit Mobilier of America, Oliver Ames, Thomas C. Durant, John J. Cisco, H.S. McComb, Sidney Dillon, Cornelius S. Bushnell, Benjamin E. Bates, John Duff, Josiah Bardwell, John B. Alley, Ebenezer Cook, F. Gordon Dexter, Charles A. Lambard, William H. Macy, John F. Tracy, George Ashman, Jesse L. Williams, Samuel McKee, James S. Rollins, James Brooks, Edwin D. Morgan, Oakes Ames and James W. Davis
New York (State). Supreme Court.
James Fisk, Jr., against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Credit Mobilier of America, Oliver Ames, Thomas C. Durant, John J. Cisco, H.S. McComb, Sidney Dillon, Cornelius S. Bushnell, Benjamin E. Bates, John Duff, Josiah Bardwell, John B. Alley, Ebenezer Cook, F. Gordon Dexter, Charles A. Lambard, William H. Macy, John F. Tracy, George Ashman, Jesse L. Williams, Samuel McKee, James S. Rollins, James Brooks, Edwin D. Morgan, Oakes Ames and James W. Davis
Jedediah H. Lathrop and others, respondents, against Moses B. Bramhall and others, appellants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Jedediah H. Lathrop and others, respondents, against Moses B. Bramhall and others, appellants
John Crosby Brown and another, plaintiffs, vs. Sarah Benedict Brown and others, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
John Crosby Brown and another, plaintiffs, vs. Sarah Benedict Brown and others, defendants
John De Koven, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as executors, and Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as trustees of the last will and testament of Hugh T. Dickey, deceased, plaintiffs, vs. Fanny Russell Dickey, Cornelia de Koven Douglas, George William Douglas, husband of Cornelia de Koven Douglas, Louise W. Dickey, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., husband of Louise W. Dickey, Anna D. Tiffany, and Frances de Koven Dickey, George P. Tiffany, as administrator, etc., Elizabeth Dickey and John De Koven, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
John De Koven, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as executors, and Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as trustees of the last will and testament of Hugh T. Dickey, deceased, plaintiffs, vs. Fanny Russell Dickey, Cornelia de Koven Douglas, George William Douglas, husband of Cornelia de Koven Douglas, Louise W. Dickey, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., husband of Louise W. Dickey, Anna D. Tiffany, and Frances de Koven Dickey, George P. Tiffany, as administrator, etc., Elizabeth Dickey and John De Koven, defendants
John G. Farnsworth, receiver of the Bankers' and Merchants' Telegraph Co., vs. the Western Union Telegraph Co
New York (State). Supreme Court.
John G. Farnsworth, receiver of the Bankers' and Merchants' Telegraph Co., vs. the Western Union Telegraph Co
John Metz, plaintiff-respondent, against John Metz, Jr., defendant-appellant
New York (State). Supreme Court.
John Metz, plaintiff-respondent, against John Metz, Jr., defendant-appellant
Marx Block, an infant, &c., plaintiff-appellant, vs. the Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railway Company, defendant-respondent
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Marx Block, an infant, &c., plaintiff-appellant, vs. the Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railway Company, defendant-respondent
Missouri lottery case, decision
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Missouri lottery case, decision
Opinion of Hon. Judge Cady, in Supreme Court
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Opinion of Hon. Judge Cady, in Supreme Court
Opinion of Mr. Justice Murray Hearn declaring the Feinberg "Subversive activities" law unconstitutional
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Opinion of Mr. Justice Murray Hearn declaring the Feinberg "Subversive activities" law unconstitutional
Opinion of the Supreme court of the State of New York, etc
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Opinion of the Supreme court of the State of New York, etc

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court
Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court, Volume 1

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...
Reports of cases of practice determined in the Supreme court of judicature of the state of New York; from April term, 1794, to November term, 1805, both inclusive. To which is prefixed all the rules and orders of the court to the year 1808
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Reports of cases of practice determined in the Supreme court of judicature of the state of New York; from April term, 1794, to November term, 1805, both inclusive. To which is prefixed all the rules and orders of the court to the year 1808
Rules of practice of the Supreme Court of the state of New York, as established by the court at a general session of the justices, at the capitol in the city of Albany, on the first Wednesday of August, 1849, in pursuance of section 470 of the Code of procedure
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Rules of practice of the Supreme Court of the state of New York, as established by the court at a general session of the justices, at the capitol in the city of Albany, on the first Wednesday of August, 1849, in pursuance of section 470 of the Code of procedure
Senator Demas Strong vs. Geo. C. Bennett, proprietor Brooklyn Daily Times
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Senator Demas Strong vs. Geo. C. Bennett, proprietor Brooklyn Daily Times
Sketches of the life, and a narrative of the trial of James Hamilton
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Sketches of the life, and a narrative of the trial of James Hamilton
Statement of the "Sayre-Ruppaner Case," and opinion of the Supreme Court
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Statement of the "Sayre-Ruppaner Case," and opinion of the Supreme Court
Supreme court of New York
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Supreme court of New York
The answer of John F. Chamberlin to the complaint of George Wilkes
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The answer of John F. Chamberlin to the complaint of George Wilkes
The case of the Centenary Methodist Episc. Church, as to the rights of trustees and the power of a court of law to compel them, by mandamus, to admit a minister appointed according to the discipline of their church
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The case of the Centenary Methodist Episc. Church, as to the rights of trustees and the power of a court of law to compel them, by mandamus, to admit a minister appointed according to the discipline of their church
The Commercial Bank of Kentucky agt. Joseph B. Varnum
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Commercial Bank of Kentucky agt. Joseph B. Varnum
The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, plaintiff, against Union Pacific Railroad Company, defendant
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, plaintiff, against Union Pacific Railroad Company, defendant
The Farmers' Loan Trust Company and others v. Charles H. Carroll and others
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Farmers' Loan Trust Company and others v. Charles H. Carroll and others
The First National Bank of the City of Brooklyn, respondent, against William T. Wallis and George T. Smith, appellants and Herman Stuetzer and Michael Fleckenstein
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The First National Bank of the City of Brooklyn, respondent, against William T. Wallis and George T. Smith, appellants and Herman Stuetzer and Michael Fleckenstein
The Hon. David S. Bennett, M.C. versus the Buffalo Commercial Advertiser, damages claimed
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Hon. David S. Bennett, M.C. versus the Buffalo Commercial Advertiser, damages claimed
The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, respondents, against Charles A. Hill, Thomas Iremonger, and others, appellants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, respondents, against Charles A. Hill, Thomas Iremonger, and others, appellants
The mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, plaintiffs, against the National Broadway Bank of the city of New York, defendant
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, plaintiffs, against the National Broadway Bank of the city of New York, defendant
The people of the state of New York ex rel., Western Electric Company, relator, vs. Frank Campbell, comptroller of the state of New York, respondent
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The people of the state of New York ex rel., Western Electric Company, relator, vs. Frank Campbell, comptroller of the state of New York, respondent
The people of the State of New York on the complaint of Charles J. Warren, appellants, against Robert B. Coleman and Charles A. Stetson, respondents
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The people of the State of New York on the complaint of Charles J. Warren, appellants, against Robert B. Coleman and Charles A. Stetson, respondents
The president, managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company against the Pennsylvania Coal Company
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The president, managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company against the Pennsylvania Coal Company
The Strong-Bennett libel suit
New York (State). Supreme Court.
The Strong-Bennett libel suit
Trial of Rev. Issachar Grosscup, for the seduction of Roxana L. Wheeler, comprising the testimony in the case, & also a sketch of the arguments addressed to the jury in behalf of the defense by Lapham, Bowne & Willson, & the reply in behalf of the prosecution by Mark H. Sibley at the February circuit of the Supreme court, held at Canandaigua, Ontario County, 1848 ...
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Trial of Rev. Issachar Grosscup, for the seduction of Roxana L. Wheeler, comprising the testimony in the case, & also a sketch of the arguments addressed to the jury in behalf of the defense by Lapham, Bowne & Willson, & the reply in behalf of the prosecution by Mark H. Sibley at the February circuit of the Supreme court, held at Canandaigua, Ontario County, 1848 ...
Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, &c., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, &c., and others, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, &c., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, &c., and others, defendants
Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, etc., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, etc., Willard P. Butler and others, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, etc., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, etc., Willard P. Butler and others, defendants
Willard Parker, plaintiff against Willard P. Butler and others, defendants
New York (State). Supreme Court.
Willard Parker, plaintiff against Willard P. Butler and others, defendants