New York (State). Supreme Court.

Other books by this author

Reset

A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme court of judicature

New York (State). Supreme Court.

A digest of the cases decided and reported in the Supreme court of judicature

Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Bertha R. Kenkele and John P. Kinkel, as surviving trustees under the last will and testament of Philip A. Kenkele, deceased, plaintiffs and respondents, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

Charles Dibbs, appellant vs. the Dry Doc, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, respondent

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Charles Dibbs, appellant vs. the Dry Doc, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, respondent

Charles S. Fairchild, John E. Parsons and John A. Bartow, as executors of the last will and testament of Mary A. Edson, deceased, plaintiffs, against Marmont B. Edson et al., defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Charles S. Fairchild, John E. Parsons and John A. Bartow, as executors of the last will and testament of Mary A. Edson, deceased, plaintiffs, against Marmont B. Edson et al., defendants

David Lyman, appellant, against Joseph H. Parsons, Catharine M. Parsons, William Stanley & Elizabeth A. Stanley, his wife, and Caroline J. Parsons and Elizabeth Parsons, respondents

New York (State). Supreme Court.

David Lyman, appellant, against Joseph H. Parsons, Catharine M. Parsons, William Stanley & Elizabeth A. Stanley, his wife, and Caroline J. Parsons and Elizabeth Parsons, respondents

David Stewart, respondent vs. Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others

New York (State). Supreme Court.

David Stewart, respondent vs. Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others

David Stewart, respondent, against Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others

New York (State). Supreme Court.

David Stewart, respondent, against Collis P. Huntington, appellant, impleaded with others

Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors of the will of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors of the will of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant

Emily O. Butler, Fanny S. Whitehouse, Caroline O. Jones, Frances O. Jones and Louis B. McCagg, plaintiffs, against Andrew H. Green and others, executors and trustees of and under the last will and testament of William B. Ogden, deceased, and others, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Emily O. Butler, Fanny S. Whitehouse, Caroline O. Jones, Frances O. Jones and Louis B. McCagg, plaintiffs, against Andrew H. Green and others, executors and trustees of and under the last will and testament of William B. Ogden, deceased, and others, defendants

Francis Vose, respondent, vs. David L. Yulee, appellant

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Francis Vose, respondent, vs. David L. Yulee, appellant

Harriet Haddock, plaintiff, against John W. Haddock, defendant, before John H. Rogan, Esq., referee

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Harriet Haddock, plaintiff, against John W. Haddock, defendant, before John H. Rogan, Esq., referee

In the matter of opening the Spuyten Duyvil Parkway

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of opening the Spuyten Duyvil Parkway

In the matter of the application of the East River bridge company for the appointment of three commissioners

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the application of the East River bridge company for the appointment of three commissioners

In the matter of the application of the New York District Railway Company for the appointment of three commissioners to determine whether its railroad ought to be allowed to be built, &c

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the application of the New York District Railway Company for the appointment of three commissioners to determine whether its railroad ought to be allowed to be built, &c

In the matter of the application of the New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company to acquire title to certain real estate of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, and others

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the application of the New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Company to acquire title to certain real estate of the Syracuse, Chenango & New York Railroad Company, and others

In the matter of the petition of the Metropolitan Transit Company of the city of New York, to determine the amount of compensation to be paid the mayor, alderman and commonalty of the city of New York

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the petition of the Metropolitan Transit Company of the city of New York, to determine the amount of compensation to be paid the mayor, alderman and commonalty of the city of New York

In the matter of the State Reservation at Niagara

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the State Reservation at Niagara

In the matter of the visitation and inspection of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children by the Supreme Court pursuant to section 16 of the membership corporations law

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of the visitation and inspection of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children by the Supreme Court pursuant to section 16 of the membership corporations law

In the matter of William Winter, a person of unsound mind

New York (State). Supreme Court.

In the matter of William Winter, a person of unsound mind

Isidor Wormser, Jr., plaintiff, against Metropolitan Street Railway Company and Interurban Street Railway Company, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Isidor Wormser, Jr., plaintiff, against Metropolitan Street Railway Company and Interurban Street Railway Company, defendants

James Fisk, Jr., against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Credit Mobilier of America, Oliver Ames, Thomas C. Durant, John J. Cisco, H.S. McComb, Sidney Dillon, Cornelius S. Bushnell, Benjamin E. Bates, John Duff, Josiah Bardwell, John B. Alley, Ebenezer Cook, F. Gordon Dexter, Charles A. Lambard, William H. Macy, John F. Tracy, George Ashman, Jesse L. Williams, Samuel McKee, James S. Rollins, James Brooks, Edwin D. Morgan, Oakes Ames and James W. Davis

New York (State). Supreme Court.

James Fisk, Jr., against the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Credit Mobilier of America, Oliver Ames, Thomas C. Durant, John J. Cisco, H.S. McComb, Sidney Dillon, Cornelius S. Bushnell, Benjamin E. Bates, John Duff, Josiah Bardwell, John B. Alley, Ebenezer Cook, F. Gordon Dexter, Charles A. Lambard, William H. Macy, John F. Tracy, George Ashman, Jesse L. Williams, Samuel McKee, James S. Rollins, James Brooks, Edwin D. Morgan, Oakes Ames and James W. Davis

Jedediah H. Lathrop and others, respondents, against Moses B. Bramhall and others, appellants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Jedediah H. Lathrop and others, respondents, against Moses B. Bramhall and others, appellants

John Crosby Brown and another, plaintiffs, vs. Sarah Benedict Brown and others, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

John Crosby Brown and another, plaintiffs, vs. Sarah Benedict Brown and others, defendants

John De Koven, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as executors, and Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as trustees of the last will and testament of Hugh T. Dickey, deceased, plaintiffs, vs. Fanny Russell Dickey, Cornelia de Koven Douglas, George William Douglas, husband of Cornelia de Koven Douglas, Louise W. Dickey, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., husband of Louise W. Dickey, Anna D. Tiffany, and Frances de Koven Dickey, George P. Tiffany, as administrator, etc., Elizabeth Dickey and John De Koven, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

John De Koven, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as executors, and Charles D. Dickey, Jr., and Cornelia de Koven Douglas, as trustees of the last will and testament of Hugh T. Dickey, deceased, plaintiffs, vs. Fanny Russell Dickey, Cornelia de Koven Douglas, George William Douglas, husband of Cornelia de Koven Douglas, Louise W. Dickey, Charles D. Dickey, Jr., husband of Louise W. Dickey, Anna D. Tiffany, and Frances de Koven Dickey, George P. Tiffany, as administrator, etc., Elizabeth Dickey and John De Koven, defendants

John G. Farnsworth, receiver of the Bankers' and Merchants' Telegraph Co., vs. the Western Union Telegraph Co

New York (State). Supreme Court.

John G. Farnsworth, receiver of the Bankers' and Merchants' Telegraph Co., vs. the Western Union Telegraph Co

John Metz, plaintiff-respondent, against John Metz, Jr., defendant-appellant

New York (State). Supreme Court.

John Metz, plaintiff-respondent, against John Metz, Jr., defendant-appellant

Marx Block, an infant, &c., plaintiff-appellant, vs. the Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railway Company, defendant-respondent

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Marx Block, an infant, &c., plaintiff-appellant, vs. the Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railway Company, defendant-respondent

Missouri lottery case, decision

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Missouri lottery case, decision

Opinion of Hon. Judge Cady, in Supreme Court

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Opinion of Hon. Judge Cady, in Supreme Court

Opinion of Mr. Justice Murray Hearn declaring the Feinberg "Subversive activities" law unconstitutional

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Opinion of Mr. Justice Murray Hearn declaring the Feinberg "Subversive activities" law unconstitutional

Opinion of the Supreme court of the State of New York, etc

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Opinion of the Supreme court of the State of New York, etc

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court, Volume 1

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court, Volume 1

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of ...

Reports of cases of practice determined in the Supreme court of judicature of the state of New York; from April term, 1794, to November term, 1805, both inclusive. To which is prefixed all the rules and orders of the court to the year 1808

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Reports of cases of practice determined in the Supreme court of judicature of the state of New York; from April term, 1794, to November term, 1805, both inclusive. To which is prefixed all the rules and orders of the court to the year 1808

Rules of practice of the Supreme Court of the state of New York, as established by the court at a general session of the justices, at the capitol in the city of Albany, on the first Wednesday of August, 1849, in pursuance of section 470 of the Code of procedure

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Rules of practice of the Supreme Court of the state of New York, as established by the court at a general session of the justices, at the capitol in the city of Albany, on the first Wednesday of August, 1849, in pursuance of section 470 of the Code of procedure

Senator Demas Strong vs. Geo. C. Bennett, proprietor Brooklyn Daily Times

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Senator Demas Strong vs. Geo. C. Bennett, proprietor Brooklyn Daily Times

Sketches of the life, and a narrative of the trial of James Hamilton

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Sketches of the life, and a narrative of the trial of James Hamilton

Statement of the "Sayre-Ruppaner Case," and opinion of the Supreme Court

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Statement of the "Sayre-Ruppaner Case," and opinion of the Supreme Court

Supreme court of New York

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Supreme court of New York

The answer of John F. Chamberlin to the complaint of George Wilkes

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The answer of John F. Chamberlin to the complaint of George Wilkes

The case of the Centenary Methodist Episc. Church, as to the rights of trustees and the power of a court of law to compel them, by mandamus, to admit a minister appointed according to the discipline of their church

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The case of the Centenary Methodist Episc. Church, as to the rights of trustees and the power of a court of law to compel them, by mandamus, to admit a minister appointed according to the discipline of their church

The Commercial Bank of Kentucky agt. Joseph B. Varnum

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Commercial Bank of Kentucky agt. Joseph B. Varnum

The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, plaintiff, against Union Pacific Railroad Company, defendant

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, plaintiff, against Union Pacific Railroad Company, defendant

The Farmers' Loan Trust Company and others v. Charles H. Carroll and others

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Farmers' Loan Trust Company and others v. Charles H. Carroll and others

The First National Bank of the City of Brooklyn, respondent, against William T. Wallis and George T. Smith, appellants and Herman Stuetzer and Michael Fleckenstein

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The First National Bank of the City of Brooklyn, respondent, against William T. Wallis and George T. Smith, appellants and Herman Stuetzer and Michael Fleckenstein

The Hon. David S. Bennett, M.C. versus the Buffalo Commercial Advertiser, damages claimed

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Hon. David S. Bennett, M.C. versus the Buffalo Commercial Advertiser, damages claimed

The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, respondents, against Charles A. Hill, Thomas Iremonger, and others, appellants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, respondents, against Charles A. Hill, Thomas Iremonger, and others, appellants

The mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, plaintiffs, against the National Broadway Bank of the city of New York, defendant

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The mayor, aldermen and commonalty of the city of New York, plaintiffs, against the National Broadway Bank of the city of New York, defendant

The people of the state of New York ex rel., Western Electric Company, relator, vs. Frank Campbell, comptroller of the state of New York, respondent

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The people of the state of New York ex rel., Western Electric Company, relator, vs. Frank Campbell, comptroller of the state of New York, respondent

The people of the State of New York on the complaint of Charles J. Warren, appellants, against Robert B. Coleman and Charles A. Stetson, respondents

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The people of the State of New York on the complaint of Charles J. Warren, appellants, against Robert B. Coleman and Charles A. Stetson, respondents

The president, managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company against the Pennsylvania Coal Company

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The president, managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company against the Pennsylvania Coal Company

The Strong-Bennett libel suit

New York (State). Supreme Court.

The Strong-Bennett libel suit

Trial of Rev. Issachar Grosscup, for the seduction of Roxana L. Wheeler, comprising the testimony in the case, & also a sketch of the arguments addressed to the jury in behalf of the defense by Lapham, Bowne & Willson, & the reply in behalf of the prosecution by Mark H. Sibley at the February circuit of the Supreme court, held at Canandaigua, Ontario County, 1848 ...

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Trial of Rev. Issachar Grosscup, for the seduction of Roxana L. Wheeler, comprising the testimony in the case, & also a sketch of the arguments addressed to the jury in behalf of the defense by Lapham, Bowne & Willson, & the reply in behalf of the prosecution by Mark H. Sibley at the February circuit of the Supreme court, held at Canandaigua, Ontario County, 1848 ...

Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, &c., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, &c., and others, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, &c., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, &c., and others, defendants

Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, etc., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, etc., Willard P. Butler and others, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Willard Parker and Daniel M. Stimson, as executors, etc., plaintiffs, vs. Benjamin F. Butler as trustee, etc., Willard P. Butler and others, defendants

Willard Parker, plaintiff against Willard P. Butler and others, defendants

New York (State). Supreme Court.

Willard Parker, plaintiff against Willard P. Butler and others, defendants