Pompeii Trogi fragmenta, quorum alia in codicibus manuscriptis Bibliothecae Ossolinianae invenit, alia in operibus, scriptorum maximam partem Polonorum, iam vulgatis primus animadvertit, fragmenta pridem nota adiunxit […]
August Bielowski
Pompeii Trogi fragmenta, quorum alia in codicibus manuscriptis Bibliothecae Ossolinianae invenit, alia in operibus, scriptorum maximam partem Polonorum, iam vulgatis primus animadvertit, fragmenta pridem nota adiunxit […]
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b> Full title:</b> Pompeii Trogi fragmenta, quorum alia in codicibus manuscriptis Bibliothecae Ossolinianae invenit, alia in operibus, scriptorum maximam partem Polonorum, iam vulgatis primus animadvertit, fragmenta pridem nota adiunxit, ac una cum prologis historiarum Philippicarum et criticis annotationibus edidit Augustus Bielowski Ossolinianae bibliothecae custos. Accedit notitia literaria de Trogo, et Index. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"> 8vo. pp. xxvi, 91. Later boards.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;">The discovery of these otherwise unknown fragments of the ‘Historiae Philippicae’ of the first-century BC Roman chronicler Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus, which concern what is now Poland, was allegedly made by August Bielowski, the Polish historian (1806-1876), in the library of the Ossolinski Institute at Lvov (now Lviv). They are treated as a forgery by Wolfgang Speyer (Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Munich, 1971, p. 323, n.3), citing M. Schanz, C. Hosius, and G. Krüger, ‘Geschichte der römischen Litteratur’, vol. ii (1935, 4th ed.), p. 326, but still seem to taken seriously in some quarters. Obviously rare.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://catalyst.library.jhu.edu/catalog/bib_5547687" rel="ugc nofollow">Click here to view the Johns Hopkins University catalog record. </a></span></span></p>
Sign in to add this book to your list.
What critics are saying
Verdicts use the same scale as your list: highly recommended through avoid — plus optional scores and blurbs.
Nobody on Critic, Sir! has logged a verdict for this title yet. The silence is either respectful or suspicious.
Sign in and use Add to My List below to share your own verdict.
Reading Lists
Sign in to create and edit public lists.
Loading lists…
Purchase & Discovery
Find this title on Amazon
Physical edition
All Books (physical editions)Search on AmazonOfficial merchandise
Official-style merch searchApparel, collectibles, and moreAs an Amazon Associate, Critic, Sir! earns from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure